Sujet : Re: WM and end segments...
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 24. Jul 2024, 01:02:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <d93e331f-4046-4234-be5f-011761c761ca@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 7/23/2024 6:25 PM, Moebius wrote:
Am 23.07.2024 um 23:53 schrieb Jim Burns:
"LLLLLLLL....." DENOTES (refers to) an infinite sequence of "L"s.
>
There are many ways to describe an infinite sequence of "L"s.
>
Sure, but in a math context I personally prefer
the usual set theoretic approach.
I can see some good reasons for your preference.
At the top of the list, I would put
_being accepted by others_ as
a description of what's intended.
And, sure enough, in a (typical) math context,
the usual set theoretic context does best at
bringing that acceptance.
My particular context is not the unusual,
in that the usual does NOT bring acceptance from
my usual sparring.partner.
"Well.ordered with step.up and non.min.step.down"
_appears_ to me to have come closest to
the flavor of acceptance which I actually want.
(I.am.not.a.mind.reader.)
I think that's why it's my favorite.
I guess it's not a terribly complicated reason.