Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
Am Sat, 03 Aug 2024 14:25:03 +0000 schrieb WM:
Yes.Here is the correct definition:You are specifying an exact number, not only at least one.
There exist NUF(x) unit fractions u, such that for all y >= x: u < y.
Note that the order is ∃ u ∀ y.
Any problems with this definition? The reversed quantification is nonsense because ℵ₀ unit fractions need ℵ₀*2^ℵ₀ points above zero.NUF(x) = ℵ₀ for all x > 0 is wrong. NUF(x) = 1 for all x > 0 already isNew sig.
wrong since there is no unit fraction smaller than all unit fractions.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.