Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 15. Aug 2024, 17:17:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <18a2b300e04c9cc47fa2d3789e8114398f370610@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Sun, 11 Aug 2024 12:24:46 +0000 schrieb WM:
Le 10/08/2024 à 19:16, FromTheRafters a écrit :
WM expressed precisely :
Le 09/08/2024 à 05:34, Jim Burns a écrit :
>
and he thinks that a set ordered with two ends is more complete than
the same set with one or zero ends.
>
The set of unit fractions has two ends, namely at 1 and before 0.
Wrong,
Name unit fractions larger than 1 or smaller than 0.
Note: Before domains without unit fractions the set has ended.
0 is not a unit fraction, so not an end; there is no smallest.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.