Re: Replacement of Cardinality

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 15. Aug 2024, 17:17:58
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <18a2b300e04c9cc47fa2d3789e8114398f370610@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Sun, 11 Aug 2024 12:24:46 +0000 schrieb WM:
Le 10/08/2024 à 19:16, FromTheRafters a écrit :
WM expressed precisely :
Le 09/08/2024 à 05:34, Jim Burns a écrit :
>
and he thinks that a set ordered with two ends is more complete than
the same set with one or zero ends.
>
The set of unit fractions has two ends, namely at 1 and before 0.
 
Wrong,
 
Name unit fractions larger than 1 or smaller than 0.
Note: Before domains without unit fractions the set has ended.
0 is not a unit fraction, so not an end; there is no smallest.

--
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.

Date Sujet#  Auteur
15 Aug 24 * Re: Replacement of Cardinality7joes
16 Aug 24 `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality6WM
16 Aug 24  `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality5Richard Damon
16 Aug 24   `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality4WM
16 Aug 24    `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality3Richard Damon
17 Aug 24     `* Re: Replacement of Cardinality2WM
17 Aug 24      `- Re: Replacement of Cardinality1Chris M. Thomasson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal