Re: Replacement of Cardinality

On 8/16/24 12:42 PM, WM wrote:

Le 15/08/2024 à 19:06, Python a écrit :
 

Our problem, as a community, is not proving Wolfgang Mückenheim wrong.
>

Your problem is that you can't think straight. If NUF grows from 0 to more, then there is a first one or more. The latter is excluded by ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0 .
 Regards, WM
 

But that only holds if NUF actually works. If there isn't a first unit fraction, NUF(x) can't actually be defined, so you are just working a circular argument, which in fact proves that your NUF(x) can't be correctly defined.