Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 16. Aug 2024, 19:43:57
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <v9o6le$1hch6$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/16/2024 11:03 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
On 8/16/24 12:59 PM, WM wrote:
Le 16/08/2024 à 18:49, joes a écrit :
Am Fri, 16 Aug 2024 16:45:29 +0000 schrieb WM:
>
It does not diminish, there are always infinitely many.
>
Not according to mathematics: ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0 .
>
Regards, WM
>
>
WHich proves that no 1/n can be the smallest, so refutes your claim.
WM is being silly, is this all on purpose? wow... Why does he still have a job that sure seems to involve trying to project his radical ignorance into the innocent minds of unsuspecting students.... YIKES!
WOW!
Re: Replacement of Cardinality
Re: Replacement of Cardinality
