Re: Replacement of Cardinality

On 8/19/2024 1:13 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 8/18/2024 2:15 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 08/18/2024 11:52 AM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:

On 8/18/2024 1:16 AM, joes wrote:

Am Sat, 17 Aug 2024 13:39:52 +0000 schrieb WM:

Le 16/08/2024 à 20:11, joes a écrit :

Am Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:00:26 +0000 schrieb WM:

Le 16/08/2024 à 18:50, joes a écrit :

Am Fri, 16 Aug 2024 16:19:17 +0000 schrieb WM:

>

Taking steps only until the next unit fraction, you never reach 0.

Start from x = 0. The increase cannot be more than 1.

No, you were counting down from 1.

There we see that counting down to 0 requires dark numbers.

Counting down from infinity is not possible. Your "dark" numbers
are a nonstandard extension.
>

>
Yup. Counting down from infinity is moronic. No wonder why WM assumes
there is a place to start counting from, aka finite...

>
Hey, it was Cantor's idea first, ....
>
>

 Do you even now how to make a Cantor Set Fractal?

It's very similar to a von Koch fractal. Fwiw, here is an older one using folding:
https://youtu.be/Q6lJqIl-Nvs