Sujet : Re: Replacement of Cardinality
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 22. Aug 2024, 14:37:17
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <3b151690080e0391017b04ca32f72bc9c3c8a260@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Thu, 22 Aug 2024 10:55:47 +0000 schrieb WM:
Le 21/08/2024 à 18:21, FromTheRafters a écrit :
WM used his keyboard to write :
The other way round. There is an end, because at and below zero there
is no unit fraction. Therefore there is an end before. Simple as that.
The "sequence" doesn't end.
Then it must go on below zero. But it does not.
It continues in ever smaller steps.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.