Sujet : Re: Unit fractions...
De : FTR (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (FromTheRafters)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 29. Aug 2024, 11:26:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Peripheral Visions
Message-ID : <vapid1$3uanr$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb
After serious thinking Chris M. Thomasson wrote :
On 8/28/2024 6:02 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
Just a little plot I did for Moebius and WM using unit fractions on any line in n-ary space. 3d here...
https://i.ibb.co/9n71tZf/ct-pov.png
https://i.ibb.co/0hXnPpf/ct-pov.png
>
Wrt WM. Are his dark numbers, say plotting unit fractions on a line. Okay. Well, they will never hit zero even though they tend to zero. So, are WM's dark numbers the residue between 0 and any unit fraction, so to speak? So, 1/0 is not a unit fraction but 1/(really_large_natural_number) is? Still finite but I was wondering about the dark parts?
They are in his imagination only. He simply "wants" them to exist so that he can use them to refute Cantor's diagonal argument about |Q| = |N|. He thinks numbers must be identified in order to pair them to show a bijection. He also thinks that failing to show a bijection means that there is no bijection.