Sujet : Re: Unit fractions...
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 30. Aug 2024, 22:50:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vaterq$lgvi$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 8/30/2024 2:49 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 8/29/2024 3:26 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
After serious thinking Chris M. Thomasson wrote :
On 8/28/2024 6:02 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
Just a little plot I did for Moebius and WM using unit fractions on any line in n-ary space. 3d here...
>
https://i.ibb.co/9n71tZf/ct-pov.png
>
https://i.ibb.co/0hXnPpf/ct-pov.png
>
>
Wrt WM. Are his dark numbers, say plotting unit fractions on a line. Okay. Well, they will never hit zero even though they tend to zero. So, are WM's dark numbers the residue between 0 and any unit fraction, so to speak? So, 1/0 is not a unit fraction but 1/(really_large_natural_number) is? Still finite but I was wondering about the dark parts?
>
They are in his imagination only. He simply "wants" them to exist so that he can use them to refute Cantor's diagonal argument about |Q| = |N|. He thinks numbers must be identified in order to pair them to show a bijection. He also thinks that failing to show a bijection means that there is no bijection.
Some more experiments just for fun:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/Acx98dhJjkV6QBPX/
Completely based on unit fractions for the underlying structure.