Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions?

Chris M. Thomasson used his keyboard to write :

On 9/7/2024 6:08 AM, WM wrote:

On 07.09.2024 04:01, Richard Damon wrote:

On 9/6/24 4:40 PM, WM wrote:

On 06.09.2024 14:38, joes wrote:

Am Fri, 06 Sep 2024 14:12:29 +0200 schrieb WM:

>

0 < ... < ⅟⌊4+⅟x⌋ < ⅟⌊3+⅟x⌋ < ⅟⌊2+⅟x⌋ < ⅟⌊1+⅟x⌋ < x

0 is smaller than all that. Therefore there is no increase at 0.
x is larger than all that. Therefore your x is not the least one
posiible.

Therefore no x can be the least unit fraction.

>
No definable x. No epsilon.

>
Which means no "Unit Fraction" as the reciprical of a Natural Number, since they are all definable.

>
All natural numbers which you recognize are definable.

>
Wow. WM seems to think that a natural number that he has not thought of yet is not definable. What a strange asshole.

 Suppose we define his definable numbers as "interesting numbers" and the rest as "uninteresting numbers"?