Sujet : Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions?
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 08. Sep 2024, 21:21:39
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <f8707e6f-d2ee-4b91-bd01-ef806425c571@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/8/2024 3:39 PM, WM wrote:
On 07.09.2024 21:01, Jim Burns wrote:
Different unit fractions are different.
>
Therefore there is only one the smallest one.
There aren't two smallest unit fractions,
and no one has said otherwise.
There isn't one smallest unit fraction because,
for each ⅟k, ⅟(k+1) disproves ⅟k being smallest.
There aren't two.
There isn't one.
There is no smallest unit fraction.
They are identical because
NUF(x) counts them at the same x,
>
Counting.at.x a unit.fraction.in.⅟ℕᵈᵉᶠ∩(0,x)
does not mean the unit fraction is at x
>
NUF counts only unit fractions at their positions.
strict NUFᑉ(x) ≥ NUFᑉᐧᵈᵉᶠ(x) = |⅟ℕᵈᵉᶠ∩(0,x)| does not
count any unit fraction at x.
0 < ⅟⌊2+⅟x⌋ < ⅟⌊1+⅟x⌋ < x
NUF(x) ≥ 2 ∨ NUF(x) = 0
NUF(x) ≠ 1