Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions?

On 9/9/24 11:01 AM, WM wrote:

On 09.09.2024 13:47, Richard Damon wrote:

On 9/9/24 6:31 AM, WM wrote:

 

And all gaps are occupied by the unit fractions. Hence every gap is too small.

>
But there is always room at the bottom, where the gaps keep getting smaller

 They all are present from the start. I simply choose a gap that is too small to contain ℵo unit fractions.

How can a claim a set of values less then a SPECIFIC NUMBER if I don't have the number?

 I claim that all unit fractions are existing as real points of the real line. Therefore there is a first one. NUF(x) cannot increase without passing 1 when real points are counted. Your ℵo points cannot exist without including 1, 2, 3 first points.
 Regards, WM
  

And are just wrong, because you don't understand what it means to be "existing" or to be a "real point".
Thus, you are just ignorant of what you talk about as your brain has exploded itself in the contradictions.
The problem is your NUF(x) can't actually be defined the way you do, as it is based on false assumptions, namely the countability of values from an unbounded end.
Sorry, you are just proving your stupidity.