Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (constructive)

On 09/12/2024 03:00 PM, Jim Burns wrote:

On 9/12/2024 4:42 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:

On 09/10/2024 02:21 AM, Jim Burns wrote:

>

(re-sent)
>
Oh, perhaps, maybe, in a sense, weighing alternatives,
it's what I'm claiming is that it isn't and not is
what BR Bertrand Russell is claiming.

>
Bertrand Russel's set is
the set of all non.self.membered sets.
not the set of all _finite_ non.self.membered sets.
>
If you intend to debate that,
it would be good to get it over and done with
instead of rushing past it
to what might be more interesting questions.
>
>
>

Actually it starts before that, if you're familiar
with the concept of "reverse mathematics" or as regards
to theorems resulting from "not all of the axioms",
when infinity isn't considered, it is the same finites.
I suggest that your own criticism applies in this
sense of, "reverse mathematics".