Sujet : Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions?
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 22. Sep 2024, 17:46:30
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <dcb1a402-dd96-46d2-b448-d10f1da39c34@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/22/2024 9:22 AM, WM wrote:
On 22.09.2024 00:32, Jim Burns wrote:
On 9/21/2024 4:11 PM, WM wrote:
On 21.09.2024 19:26, Jim Burns wrote:
There is no transfinite WWMB ordinal ξ before
the first transfinite ordinal, WWMB ω
>
That may be. But then
there is no complete set of natural numbers
and no ω.
>
WWMB ω is the first transfinite ordinal.
Existing or not.existing, WWMB ω isn't
anything other than the first transfinite ordinal.
>
As long as it's WWMB ω which you discuss,
WWMB ω-1 doesn't exist.
>
Then ω does not exist.
If
we are discussing
Boolos's ST with plural quantification,
⎛ ∃{}
⎜ ∃z=x∪{y}
⎝ ∀.extensionality
⎛ ∃∃⦃y:P(y)⦄
⎜ ∀x: x ∈ ⦃y:P(y)⦄ ⇔ P(x)
⎝ ∀∀.extensionality
then
there is WWMB ω = ⦃y:ℕ(y)⦄ and
there isn't WWMB ω-1 such that (ω-1)+1 = ω
Which of {} x∪{y} ⦃y:P(y)⦄
do you deny exists?