Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions?

On 9/25/24 11:23 AM, WM wrote:

On 25.09.2024 13:53, Richard Damon wrote:

On 9/24/24 3:43 PM, WM wrote:

 

I think that mathematics of fractions is correct.
It contains ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0 from which follows that never two different5 fractions sit upon each other. From NUF(0) = 0 the smallest unit fraction follows immediately, From it the largest natural number.

 

Except that there doesn't exist a largest natural number, BY DEFINITION,

 That may be. Then there are no complete sets, no actual infinity. Good for maths, bad for matheology.
 Regards, WM
 

But of course there is a complete set, it is just infinite so you can't make it in finite work as your finite logic requires.
Your problem is your "math" just can't handle actually infinite things.
Sorry, your mind is just all exploded from the contradictions created by your finite logic being applied to things it can't handle.
Your putting doen of "mathology" is just your admission that you are just as stupid as the flat-earthers who ignore the actual evidence.