Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions?

On 9/25/2024 8:26 AM, WM wrote:

On 25.09.2024 13:54, Richard Damon wrote:

On 9/24/24 3:38 PM, WM wrote:

On 24.09.2024 10:00, joes wrote:

Am Sun, 22 Sep 2024 15:28:38 +0200 schrieb WM:

>

Really existing sets of real unit fractions have two ends.

What is „an end”?

>
An end is where nothing follows.

>
And thus the lower end of the numbers x > 0 would be 0, a value not in the set, as the set doesn't have a lower end in it.

 If it is a set (actual infinity), then the set has a smallest member. But that is hard to understand.

>
That is why there is no smallest positive real or unit fraction.

 It is easier to understand with unit fractions. But most mathematicians are too stupid even for this obvious fact.

If you truly believe in a smallest unit fraction and/or largest natural number, well.... You are totally whacked out. You say most mathematicians are too stupid. I think that its you projecting yourself on others? ;^)