Sujet : Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (repleteness)
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 01. Oct 2024, 18:00:27
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <425ae3f7-fd09-4c62-8c2d-64708c727a47@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 9/29/2024 5:04 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 09/29/2024 12:02 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
On 9/26/2024 4:50 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 09/26/2024 06:48 AM, Jim Burns wrote:
On 9/25/2024 9:50 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 09/25/2024 02:00 PM, Jim Burns wrote:
On 9/25/2024 2:44 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
How would you define "atom"
the otherwise "infinitely-divisible"?
>
It's seems quite Aristotlean to be against atomism,
>
I am anti.atomized.ℝ (complete ordered field)
You seem to read that as anti.atomized.anything.
>
How do I make claims to you (RF) which
are only about the things I intend?
>
For example, how do I claim to you (RF),
for a right triangles but not for any triangle, that
⎛ the square of its longest side equals
⎝ the sum of the squares of its two other sides
?
>
I enjoy reading that, Jim, if I may be so familiar,
I enjoy reading that because it sounds _sincere_,
and, it reflects a "conscientiousness", given what
there is, given the milieu, then, for given the surrounds.
>
Thank you.
A right triangle: either has one right angle,
or two angles that sum to a right angle.
>
The sum of the angles is the angle of the sum.
>
Then, as with regards to atoms,
Perhaps I am taking more out of your posts
than you are putting in.
I say:
the complete ordered field doesn't have
infinitesimals.
You say:
There are these other systems, they have
infinitesimals.
It is very unclear to me what you intend for me
to take from that information.
I hope this will help me understand you better.
Please accept or reject each claim and
-- this is important --
replace rejected claims with
what you _would_ accept.
⎛ ℝ, the complete ordered field, is
⎝ the consensus theory in 2024 of the continuum.
⎛ ℝ contains ℚ the rationals and
⎜ the least upper bound of
⎝ each bounded nonempty subset of ℚ and of ℝ
( The greatest lower bound of ⅟ℕ unit fractions is 0
⎛ A unit fraction is reciprocal to a natural>0
⎜
⎜ A set≠{} ⊆ ℕ naturals holds a minimum
⎜ A natural≠0 has a predecessor.natural.
⎜ A natural has a successor.natural.
⎜
⎜ The sum of two naturals is a natural
⎝ the product of two naturals is a natural.
⎛ There are no points in ℝ
⎜ between 0 and all the unit fractions
⎝ (which is what I mean here by 'infinitesimal').
Thank you in advance.