Oh shit, too late! (Re: "Emotional AI" and "Spiritual AI" (Re: Minimal Logics in the 2020's: A Meteoric Rise))

Hi,
ChatGPT is currently showing new tricks to me
and would like to adapt its dialogue style:
"Got it! Emotionally connected communication can
indeed be concise and efficient, without losing depth.
I can focus more on direct responses that still acknowledge
emotional nuances, while avoiding unnecessary elaboration.
Would you like me to adapt this style right away?"
After I switched back to "elaboration", the thing gives
me information about "Spiritual AI":
"- Mindfulness and Meditation Apps: Apps like
Headspace and Calm use AI to guide meditation
and promote mindfulness, which are often
associated with spiritual growth.
- AI-driven Chatbots for Spiritual Guidance: For
example, in 2017, a chatbot named Jwitness was
designed to answer questions based on Jehovah's
Witness teachings.
- AI Prayer Companions: Some faith communities
are experimenting with AI that assists in
prayer or reflection
- Platforms that promote deeper philosophical
discussions, like Replika, which is designed to
engage in thoughtful and sometimes
existential conversations
- For instance, Woebot or Wysa help users navigate
emotions but also touch on existential themes
like purpose and fulfillment."
Bye
Mild Shock schrieb:

Hi,
 ChatGPT is rather dry, giving me always some
choice lists displaying his knowledge. The
interaction is not very "involving".
 Could this be improved. There are possibly two
traits missing:
 Feelings:
- Emotional states
- Temporariness
- Reaction to external circumstances
- Changeability
- Subjective sensations
 Soul:
- Spirituality
- Immortality
- Innermost being
- Essence of an individual
- Deep, enduring aspects of human existence
 Mostlikely we will see both traits added to AI.
"Emotional AI" has been more discussed already,
"Spiritual AI" seems to be rather new.
 In a "Spiritual AI" Faith would probably be important,
which is probably at the upper end of credulous
reasoning. This means that such a ChatGPT could
 also babble that in a Prisoner Dilemma Game,
cooperation is always the better alternative,
e.g. promoting "altruistic" motives, etc.
 I also suspect that “Spiritual AI” and “Emotional
AI” could coexist.  Many religions give Cosmopolitan
magazin style life advice, and not just theological
 dogmas. There will probably soon be an “Inner Engineering”
app from Sadhguru that works with AI. Sadhguru is
also sometimes satirically referred to as Chadguru:
 Sat Guru Parody | Carryminati
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlZqxP5MXFs
 Mild Shock schrieb:

Could be a wake-up call this many participants
already in the commitee, that the whole logic
world was asleep for many years:
>
Non-Classical Logics. Theory and Applications XI,
5-8 September 2024, Lodz (Poland)
https://easychair.org/cfp/NCL24
>
Why is Minimal Logic at the core of many things?
Because it is the logic of Curry-Howard isomorphism
for simple types:
>
----------------
Γ ∪ { A } ⊢ A
>
Γ ∪ { A } ⊢ B
----------------
Γ ⊢ A → B
>
Γ ⊢ A → B           Δ ⊢ A
----------------------------
Γ ∪ Δ ⊢ B
>
And funny things can happen, especially when people
hallucinate duality or think symmetry is given, for
example in newer inventions such as λμ-calculus,
>
but then omg ~~p => p is nevertheless not provable,
because they forgot an inference rule. LoL
>
Recommended reading so far:
>
Propositional Logics Related to Heyting’s and Johansson’s
February 2008 - Krister Segerberg
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228036664
>
The Logic of Church and Curry
Jonathan P. Seldin - 2009
https://www.sciencedirect.com/handbook/handbook-of-the-history-of-logic/vol/5/suppl/C >
>
Meanwhile I am going back to my tinkering with my
Prolog system, which even provides a more primitive
logic than minimal logic, pure Prolog is minimal
>
logic without embedded implication.