Sujet : Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions?
De : chris.m.thomasson.1 (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Chris M. Thomasson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 07. Oct 2024, 21:12:21
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <ve1fb6$1r206$10@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/7/2024 8:19 AM, joes wrote:
Am Mon, 07 Oct 2024 11:51:43 +0200 schrieb WM:
On 07.10.2024 11:36, FromTheRafters wrote:
WM formulated the question :
On 06.10.2024 19:03, FromTheRafters wrote:
A set is a collection of well-defined objects, meaning we must be
able to determine if an element belongs to a particulr set.
>
But you can't determine the smallest unit fraction although it is a
singleton set, a point on the real axis.
There is no smallest unit fraction.
If there are only fixed points, then there is a point such that between
it and zero there is no further point.
How do you imagine that? It has a finite distance from 0.
They (unit fractions) get infinitely close to zero, but never equal it...
The distance from 1 to 0 is finite. However, the unit fractions can try to "fill" it with a certain granularity, getting closer and closer to zero. It's rather coarse when compared to the reals... ;^)
It seems that WM confuses the unit fractions with the reals as if he thinks there is a smallest unit fraction that equals zero. There is a real that equals zero, namely, well, zero. However, there is no unit fraction that equals zero, so WM's head explodes... Fwiw, here is a video of WM trying to understand infinity:
(Big Trouble in Little China - Thunder blows himself up)
https://youtu.be/A_MnyV-HH3UWOW!!!