Sujet : Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary)
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 08. Oct 2024, 00:44:32
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <1uydndG6Qf3L75n6nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 10/07/2024 09:11 AM, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
FromTheRafters <FTR@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Alan Mackenzie wrote :
>
[ .... ]
>
The idea of one countable set being "bigger" than another countable set is
simply nonsense.
>
Oops. Finite sets are countable too. :)
>
Yes indeed! Thanks for pointing out my mistake. What I should have
written (WM please take note) is:
>
The idea of one countably infinite set being "bigger" than another
countably infinite set is simply nonsense.
>
Oh, no, there are plenty of "size" relations given other
aspects that merely cardinality that have anything else
to do with what a set models.
For example, there's OUTPACING which makes for that
a proper superset of a set, is larger, by the OUTPACING
relation, it's a fact of mathematics.
And exactly half of the integers are even.
It's called density and it's a property of
them including sets of them.
You're about as bad.