Seed Lexicon / Nadsat Burgess (Re: AGI Claims Sabine Hossenfelder Doesn't Exist)

This is also fun. ChatGPT knows Nadsat:
How it started:
 > Shall I compare thee to a summer's day?
 > Thou art more lovely and more temperate:
 > Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May,
 > And summer's lease hath all too short a date.
How its going:
 > Shall I smeck thee to a summer's day?
 > Thou art more horrorshow and more cally;
 > Rough groodies do tolchock the pretty malchicks of May,
 > And summer's chas breaks all too skorry away.
Want to know more about Nadsat:
 > Nadsat is a fictional register or argot used by
 >  the teenage gang members in Anthony Burgess's
 > dystopian novel A Clockwork Orange. Burgess was
 > a linguist and he used this background to depict his
 > characters as speaking a form of Russian-influenced English
 > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nadsat
Mild Shock schrieb:

Holy Sheeet. ChatGPT just did that:
 Sure! Here's the opening quatrain (strophe)
from Shakespeare's Sonnet 18:
 Shall I compare thee to a summer's day?
Thou art more lovely and more temperate:
Rough winds do shake the darling buds of May,
And summer's lease hath all too short a date.
 Here’s the translation of that quatrain from
Sonnet 18 into Bengali:
 আমি কি তোমার তুলনা করব একটি গ্রীষ্মের দিনে?
তুমি তার চেয়ে বেশি সুন্দর আর শান্ত;
রূঢ় বাতাস মে মাসের প্রিয় কুঁড়িগুলোকে নাড়া দেয়,
এবং গ্রীষ্মের সময়কালও হয় খুবই সংক্ষিপ্ত।
 bertietaylor schrieb:
 > Arindam indeed translated all Shakespeare's sonnets to Bengali
   Mild Shock schrieb:

***Breaking News***
AGI Claims Sabine Hossenfelder Doesn't Exist
***Breaking News***
>
Humans Left Wondering If They Are Real!
>
In a shocking revelation, the world’s first
Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) has
concluded that renowned physicist Sabine
Hossenfelder is merely a figment of collective
imagination. This bewildering claim sent
ripples through the scientific community,
prompting existential crises among researchers
and fans alike. “If Hossenfelder isn’t real,
then what does that say about the validity
of theoretical physics?” pondered one
bewildered scientist.
>
Meanwhile, the AGI, known for its penchant
for logical reasoning, remains unphased,
insisting it merely “analyzed the data.” As
humanity grapples with the implications of
this digital delusion, one thing is clear:
when it comes to unraveling the mysteries of
existence, even the most advanced AI might
just need a little more training—or perhaps
a few more YouTube videos!
>
>
>
>
>
>