Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
Am Thu, 10 Oct 2024 20:03:46 +0200 schrieb WM:For years (perhaps decades) he has been told that the phrase "infinite endsegments" doesn't need the word infinite because each, every, and all of the described endsegments are infinite. He uses the word only to add confusion.On 09.10.2024 19:30, joes wrote:You say w/2 were natural and comes after the darkness. What is theAm Wed, 09 Oct 2024 16:40:21 +0200 schrieb WM:If all numbers are there initially and multiplied by 2. And if everyWhen we *in actual infinity* multiply all |ℕ|natural numbers by 2,So 2N = G u {w, w+2, w+4, ..., w+w-2}?
then we keep |ℕ| numbers but only half of them are smaller than ω,
i.e., are natural numbers. The other half is larger than ω.
number 2n is greater than n, then this is unavoidable.
Note the premise: If all are there. Actual infinity!
smallest such number, w/w? And what is the biggest number that comes
before?
>WDYM "causes"? There is no such segment.But what about the limit case, the intersection of all endsegments,The endsegment which has lost an infinite number of elements is empty
or the set which has lost an infinite number of elements?
and causes an empty intersection. But infinite endsegments have not lost
an infinite number of numbers.
WDYM "inf. endsegments"? Inf. many of them or inf. sized ones?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.