Sujet : Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary)
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 20. Oct 2024, 12:50:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <f83027f1076e1df727ce07855ad6ec66d5b1484e@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 10/20/24 3:40 AM, WM wrote:
On 20.10.2024 00:08, Jim Burns wrote:
On 10/19/2024 2:28 PM, WM wrote:
>
The contradiction is independent of infinity.
It is your claim that
>
infinitely.many exchanges in an infinite set
(vanishing Bob)
Every exchange is _one_ lossless exchange.
>
exchanging two objects
can result in the loss of one of them.
>
I fixed that for you.
It is nonsense like:
∀n ∈ ℕ: |{2, 4, 6, ..., 2n}|/|{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ..., 2n} = 1/2
but |{2, 4, 6, ...}|/|{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ...} = 1.
Regards, WM
Right, but
|{2, 4, 6, ...}| is Aleph_0, as is |{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, ...}|
Which is a value you have admitted your mathematics doesn't have.
You have admitted that your "actual infinity" isn't actually infinite, and just a term used to lie.
I(nfinity isn't just "really big numbers" like you want to treat it, but a set of numbers with DIFFERENT properties from the finite.