Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
On 10/20/2024 11:33 AM, Jim Burns wrote:On 10/20/2024 12:30 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:On 10/20/2024 06:36 AM, Jim Burns wrote:
>Is there some sort of protocol>
which you (RF) recognize
in order to talk about a thing
and not.talk about things not.that?
Here there's freedom of speech it one of
what we call constitutional liberties,
I take your answer to mean
"no, there is no such protocol".
>
Surely,
with your degree in mathematics,
you understand that
you are depriving yourself of
the use of a powerful tool.
Au contraire, to the contrary,Microscopes and
I proffer that
extending the relevant domain while keeping it
a completely connected relevant domain
_is_ a most proper and surmounting
improvement of the discourse,
to include the wider considerations of
a topic in the _foundations_ of the theory,
not merely a single theorem
under a microscope.
Anyways you still haven't picked "anti and only".I vaguely recall that
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.