Sujet : Re: E c N
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 22. Oct 2024, 21:24:49
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <8a6e5a5e367cd536b320faf0453cca8230d8e1cc@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Tue, 22 Oct 2024 18:12:44 +0200 schrieb WM:
On 22.10.2024 18:03, Jim Burns wrote:
On 10/22/2024 4:13 AM, WM wrote:
ℕ is defined such that n ∈ ℕ ⇔ ∃{0,1,...,n-1,n}
Most of all it is an invariable set with all its elements existing and
subject to doubling.
∀n ∈ ℕ: 2×n ∈ ℕ
Not if all elements are existing before multiplication already.
WAT. *Especially* if all elements exist those are in there.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.