Re: 2N=E

On 10/23/2024 11:03 AM, WM wrote:

On 23.10.2024 13:37, Richard Damon wrote:
>

>
Your complete set of the Natural Numbers is not complete.

>
I take what is given: the complete set of natural numbers. I double it
an get, according to mathematics 2n > n greater numbers than were given
to me.
>
Regards, WM
>

WM having trouble with related rates problems again?
That's all it seems.
Otherwise it's perhaps some intuition about
the modular, here modulo 2 of the integer moduli,
it's really totally simple and it's defined by
number theory with regards to integer moduli
and asymptotic density and a bit of introduction to
recurrence relations.
Then usual bizarro-trolls should not get ahead of
themselves when those are simple facts about the
objects of interest, when not so merely "sets",
but all the relations that make those "sets"
model anything else.