Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
On 10/26/2024 9:04 AM, WM wrote:No. But most natnumbers cannot be defined. This can best be understood by the unit fractions.On 26.10.2024 05:21, Jim Burns wrote:Huh? Confusing to me. Humm... Are you trying to suggest that a natural number can _not_ be a natural number?On 10/25/2024 3:15 PM, WM wrote:>>Mainly, among other points, the claim that>
all unit fractions can be defined and the claim that
a Bob can disappear in lossless exchanges.
The proof that all unit fractions can be defined
is to define them
as reciprocals of positive countable.to.from.0 numbers.
>
That describes all of them and only them.
No, you falsely assume that all natnumbers can be defined.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.