Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
Am Sun, 27 Oct 2024 17:12:23 +0100 schrieb WM:Between two unit fractions there are uncountably many x > 0. Therefore your claim is wrong.Am 27.10.2024 um 14:54 schrieb Moebius:Am 27.10.2024 um 08:38 schrieb WM:
>and after NUF(x') = 1There is no x' e IR such that NUF(x') = 1.Which is obviously the case.Hint: For each and every x e IR, x <= 0: NUF(x) = 0 and for each andThat is blatantly wrong because it would require that ℵo unit fractions
every x e IR, x > 0: NUF(x) = aleph_0.
exist between 0 and each and every x > 0,
If there were a real x with finitely manyThere is a smallest UF. This is obviously the case if mathematics is correct: ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0 .
UFs less than it, the finitely many larger UFs... couldn't have
infinitely many lesser UFs. Unless you claim finitely many UFs.
This is the definition of NUF(x): There are NUF(x) UFs between 0 and x. Not: For given x, there are infinitely many UFs.i.e., the open interval (0, 1].No, you shifted the quantifiers again.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.