Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
On 10/27/24 12:12 PM, WM wrote:NUF increases by 1 or more, but more would violate mathematics.Am 27.10.2024 um 14:54 schrieb Moebius:No two together, but no need for one to be first at the large 'n' end of them.Am 27.10.2024 um 08:38 schrieb WM:>
>and after NUF(x') = 1>
There is no x' e IR such that NUF(x') = 1.
If all unit fractions are existing, then there is each one. Never two or more are at the same point. Hence there is a single one first.
Hint: For each and every x e IR, x <= 0: NUF(x) = 0>
and for each and every x e IR, x > 0: NUF(x) = aleph_0.
That is blatantly wrong because it would require that ℵo unit fractions exist between 0 and each and every x > 0, i.e., the open interval (0, 1].
Right, like is what happens.This infinity between 0 and (0, 1] is not what I can accept.
It may seem strange to a person stuck in finite logic, but is true when you understand how infinity works.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.