Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
On 10/31/2024 4:36 AM, Richard Damon wrote:Yep, that is his claim, that there MUST be a smallest unit fraction (and any smaller are somehow "dark").On 10/30/24 10:04 AM, WM wrote:Does WM think that there is a unit fraction that is "closest" to 0? If so, he is moronic yet again... Wow.On 30.10.2024 13:57, FromTheRafters wrote:>WM explained :>>NUF(0) = 0, NUF(1) = ℵo. Therefore NUF must grow but cannot grow by more than 1 at any point x of the real axis.>
The number of unit fractions less than x is always aleph_zero for positive x.
Believe what you like without foundation.
If ∀n ∈ ℕ: 1/n - 1/(n+1) > 0 is true, the NUF(x) grows in steps of not more than 1.
>
Regards, WM
>
No, what that expression shows is that for every n, the unit fraction 1/ n has another unit fraction 1/(n+1) that is smaller than it, so there is no "first" unit fraction in that sense for NUF(x) to get to 1.
>
You are just proving you don't undetstand even your own mathematics.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.