Sujet : Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary)
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 02. Nov 2024, 20:37:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <37d5162a-cd85-4ae8-a768-104746551ebb@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11/2/2024 2:02 PM, Ross Finlayson wrote:
On 11/02/2024 07:10 AM, Jim Burns wrote:
[...]
>
The delta-epsilonics of course,
or some put it "delta-epsilontics",
with little d and smaller e,
or, as others put it,
all arbitrarily.small δ > 0 with
each having small.enough ε > 0 existing
of often for induction arbitrary m and larger n,
is well-known to all students of calculus.
>
"The infinitesimal analysis", ....
The delta.epsilonics well.known to students of calculus
is not infinitesimal analysis.
For δ > 0 and ε > 0
there are _finite_ j and k such that
δ > ⅟j > 0 and ε > ⅟k > 0
j and k follow true.or.not.first.false.ly from
the line studied by those students being described
as containing all ratios of finites and also
sufficient points more such that,
wherever a function jumps,
there is a point.of.discontinuity.
(intermediate value theorem)
I.e., in a manner of speaking,
the infinite transfinite cardinals
don't exist in delta-epsilonics
any more than plain manner-of-speaking "infinity".
In a manner of speaking,
when I use my computer,
I am _not_ using
transistors and logic gates and bit packets.
Certainly, I _can_ use it without
any awareness of all that.
However, that and those things not.existing
are different.