Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
Am Sat, 02 Nov 2024 18:42:15 +0100 schrieb WM:Every natnumber is finite. But here I mean that not only induction can be applied and that induction is not valid for all natnumbers.On 02.11.2024 14:50, Moebius wrote:Lol. That actually sheds some light on your thought process:Am 02.11.2024 um 14:21 schrieb joes:Actual infinity is not based on claims for each and every, but concernsAm Fri, 01 Nov 2024 18:03:26 +0100 schrieb WM:>or each and every n e IN there is an n' e IN (say n' = n+1)If an invariable set of numbers is there, then there is a smallest
and a largest number of those which are existing.
all.
how do you suppose some property holds for all x, but not
for every?
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.