Sujet : Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary)
De : james.g.burns (at) *nospam* att.net (Jim Burns)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 04. Nov 2024, 22:46:20
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <6e14b8ab-0b72-4d8d-b8c7-6aedd568b348@att.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 11/2/2024 5:28 PM, WM wrote:
On 02.11.2024 20:52, Jim Burns wrote:
On 11/2/2024 1:50 PM, WM wrote:
On 02.11.2024 15:10, Jim Burns wrote:
On 11/1/2024 1:24 PM, WM wrote:
Hence
at least ℵ₀ points with
ℵ₀ intervals of uncountably many points
must be between 0 and x₀.
>
That cannot happen at x₀ = 0.
>
Each x₀ > 0 is an x₀ where it happens.
>
No.
Yes.
x₀ ≥ ⅟⌈n+⅟x₀⌉ > 0
E pur si muove.
At least ℵ₀ points
with ℵ₀ intervals of uncountably many points
must be between 0 and x₀.
This criterion is not satisfied by every point x > 0,
No.
x₀ ≥ ⅟⌈n+⅟x₀⌉ > ⅟⌈n+1+⅟x₀⌉ > 0
E pur si muove.
but it is satisfied by
every definable or visible point x > 0.
every point.between.splits > 0 of
differences of ratios of countable.to numbers.
Why do you not see this requirement?
I see that you require us to be talking about
what we are not talking about:
points which _aren't_ between.splits > 0 of
differences of ratios of countable.to numbers.
i.
That's not a thing.
You are not in command of what we do and don't talk about.
ii.
_Even if you were in command_
The reason that, for each real x > 0
there are ℕ.many unit fractions between 0 and x
is not that _we say so_
Our (hypothetical) not.saying.so can't change it being so.