Sujet : Re: 2N=E
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 06. Nov 2024, 12:31:35
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <e9fda3f99e9719238c4398e5147c399818bc2cb0@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Mon, 04 Nov 2024 12:28:44 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 03.11.2024 23:40, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
On 11/3/2024 3:56 AM, WM wrote:
If all naturals are there, then no further one is available.
Sigh. There are infinite natural numbers, there is no last largest one.
Why can't you get this!
Because Cantor applies all with no exception for enumerating purposes.
Yes, and you can't seem to imagine the infinite whole.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.