Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers

Liste des GroupesRevenir à s math 
Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.math
Date : 07. Nov 2024, 14:03:23
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vgidqq$2l5nh$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 07.11.2024 12:18, Jim Burns wrote:
On 11/7/2024 3:46 AM, WM wrote:

I want to find out from you (WM)
what "not in contact with" means.
 For a point
in the boundary but not in the set,
is it "not in contact with" the set?
Is it "in contact with" the set?
It is not in contact with the set. "For every eps" is not a valid criterion because eps depends on what you can define, not on what exists. The endpoint is in contact with the set.

0 is in the boundary of [-1,0) > Is 0 "in contact with" [-1,0) ?
I am not an expert on these things. I would say it is in contact with the set because a point of the set is next to it. The closure of a set is in contact with the set.
Regards, WM

Date Sujet#  Auteur
4 Nov 24 * Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers501Jim Burns
4 Nov 24 `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers500WM
4 Nov 24  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers499Jim Burns
4 Nov 24   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers474WM
5 Nov 24   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers473Jim Burns
5 Nov 24   i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers4Jim Burns
5 Nov 24   i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (re-Vitali-ized)3Ross Finlayson
5 Nov 24   i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (re-Vitali-ized)2Ross Finlayson
6 Nov 24   i i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (re-Vitali-ized)1Chris M. Thomasson
6 Nov 24   i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers463WM
6 Nov 24   i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers462Jim Burns
6 Nov 24   i i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers459WM
6 Nov 24   i i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers458Jim Burns
6 Nov 24   i i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers457WM
6 Nov 24   i i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers456Jim Burns
7 Nov 24   i i i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers455WM
7 Nov 24   i i i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers7Jim Burns
7 Nov 24   i i i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers6WM
7 Nov 24   i i i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers5Jim Burns
7 Nov 24   i i i    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers4WM
7 Nov 24   i i i    i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Jim Burns
7 Nov 24   i i i    i   i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
7 Nov 24   i i i    i   `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Chris M. Thomasson
7 Nov 24   i i i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers447Jim Burns
7 Nov 24   i i i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers446WM
8 Nov 24   i i i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers445Jim Burns
8 Nov 24   i i i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers444WM
8 Nov 24   i i i        +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers13Richard Damon
8 Nov 24   i i i        i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers12WM
8 Nov 24   i i i        i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Richard Damon
9 Nov 24   i i i        i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
8 Nov 24   i i i        i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers9joes
8 Nov 24   i i i        i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers7Moebius
8 Nov 24   i i i        i  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers6Moebius
9 Nov 24   i i i        i  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers5WM
9 Nov 24   i i i        i  i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers4Chris M. Thomasson
10 Nov 24   i i i        i  i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers3Moebius
10 Nov 24   i i i        i  i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2WM
10 Nov 24   i i i        i  i     `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Chris M. Thomasson
9 Nov 24   i i i        i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
8 Nov 24   i i i        +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (doubling-spaces)2Ross Finlayson
8 Nov 24   i i i        i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (doubling-spaces)1Ross Finlayson
8 Nov 24   i i i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers428Jim Burns
9 Nov 24   i i i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers427WM
10 Nov 24   i i i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers426Jim Burns
10 Nov 24   i i i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers425WM
10 Nov 24   i i i            +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (exponential)1Ross Finlayson
10 Nov 24   i i i            +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers387Jim Burns
11 Nov 24   i i i            i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers386WM
11 Nov 24   i i i            i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers385Jim Burns
11 Nov 24   i i i            i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers384WM
11 Nov 24   i i i            i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers5FromTheRafters
12 Nov 24   i i i            i   i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers4WM
12 Nov 24   i i i            i   i +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1FromTheRafters
12 Nov 24   i i i            i   i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2joes
12 Nov 24   i i i            i   i  `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
12 Nov 24   i i i            i   +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Jim Burns
12 Nov 24   i i i            i   i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
12 Nov 24   i i i            i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers376Jim Burns
12 Nov 24   i i i            i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers375WM
12 Nov 24   i i i            i     `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers374Jim Burns
12 Nov 24   i i i            i      `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers373WM
13 Nov 24   i i i            i       +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Jim Burns
13 Nov 24   i i i            i       i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
13 Nov 24   i i i            i       `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers370Jim Burns
13 Nov 24   i i i            i        `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers369WM
13 Nov 24   i i i            i         `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers368Jim Burns
13 Nov 24   i i i            i          `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers367WM
14 Nov 24   i i i            i           `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers366Jim Burns
14 Nov 24   i i i            i            +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers6FromTheRafters
14 Nov 24   i i i            i            i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers5Jim Burns
14 Nov 24   i i i            i            i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers3Ross Finlayson
15 Nov 24   i i i            i            i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (research)2Ross Finlayson
15 Nov 24   i i i            i            i i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (research)1Ross Finlayson
14 Nov 24   i i i            i            i `- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1FromTheRafters
14 Nov 24   i i i            i            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers359WM
14 Nov 24   i i i            i             +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers289Jim Burns
15 Nov 24   i i i            i             i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers288WM
15 Nov 24   i i i            i             i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2joes
15 Nov 24   i i i            i             i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
15 Nov 24   i i i            i             i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers285Jim Burns
15 Nov 24   i i i            i             i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers284WM
15 Nov 24   i i i            i             i   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers283Chris M. Thomasson
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers278Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i+- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i+* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    ii`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers274Chris M. Thomasson
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers273Chris M. Thomasson
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Chris M. Thomasson
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers13FromTheRafters
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers12Chris M. Thomasson
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Moebius
17 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers7Moebius
17 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i i`* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers6Chris M. Thomasson
17 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers5Moebius
17 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i i  +* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Moebius
17 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i i  i`- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1WM
17 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Chris M. Thomasson
17 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2FromTheRafters
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    i  `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers257Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    +- Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers1Moebius
16 Nov 24   i i i            i             i    `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers2Moebius
14 Nov 24   i i i            i             `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers69Jim Burns
10 Nov 24   i i i            `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers36Chris M. Thomasson
6 Nov 24   i i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (opinions)2Ross Finlayson
6 Nov 24   i `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers5WM
4 Nov 24   `* Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers24Chris M. Thomasson

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal