Liste des Groupes | Revenir à s math |
On 11/6/2024 4:07 PM, Moebius wrote:Nope. There simply is no "sum".Am 06.11.2024 um 22:04 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:Since there is no largest natural number, the sum is a natural number?
>sum [series],>
>
1+2+3+4+5+6+...
is not a natural number. :-P
Right. Using the usual math lingo (and notions):See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_(mathematics)
>It still equals a natural number at every iteration.
I guess, what you mean is:
>
For all n e IN:
>
1 + ... + n
>
is a natural number (i.e. in IN).
>
Yeah. (Simple proof by induction.)
>
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.