Sujet : Re: A question for set-theorists
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 22. Nov 2024, 13:28:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <935b83f4a41c3d50bc30753250e7dd77213fc9c3@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Thu, 21 Nov 2024 22:44:19 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 21.11.2024 22:03, joes wrote:
Am Thu, 21 Nov 2024 12:54:22 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 21.11.2024 01:18, joes wrote:
Am Wed, 20 Nov 2024 19:32:38 +0100 schrieb WM:
The density of coloured intervals within the first n intervals is a
sequence converging to zero. Every positive eps is undercut. The
limit cannot be 1.
Formally: lim n->oo n/(2^n) = 0
But you don't believe it?
I don't believe in falsehoods. How do you derive the above? Both the
denominator and numerator diverge. The expression oo/oo is undefined.
like lim n->oo n/n^3?
Right. What even is oo^3.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.
A question for set-theorists
Re: A question for set-theorists