Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
De : FTR (at) *nospam* nomail.afraid.org (FromTheRafters)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 27. Nov 2024, 23:29:16
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Peripheral Visions
Message-ID : <vi86g1$6ns9$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb
WM formulated on Wednesday :
On 27.11.2024 22:14, Richard Damon wrote:
On 11/27/24 2:15 PM, WM wrote:
>
It it the successor for the SET of natural numbers.
>
And that is nothing else but all natural numbers.
No, the set is different from its members.
>
By what?
Mathematics!