Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 29. Nov 2024, 20:46:19
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <HrucnThvAoeVh9f6nZ2dnZfqn_oAAAAA@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 11/29/2024 11:37 AM, WM wrote:
On 29.11.2024 19:08, Jim Burns wrote:
>
>
After all the swaps
(of which no swap is a change in cardinality)
what remains is a proper subset
>
Not proper. No element can leave by swaps.
>
> (which is not a change in cardinality).
>
Irrelevant. Cardinality is a fuzzy measure.
>
Regards, WM
So it's like a hydra-head and a hive-mind?
Don't you have one theory where there's both?