Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 12/2/2024 3:56 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 03.12.2024 um 00:51 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 12/1/2024 9:50 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 02.12.2024 um 00:11 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

On 11/30/2024 3:12 AM, WM wrote:

>

Finite initial segment[s]: F(n) = {1, 2, 3, ..., n}    (n e IN).

[...]
>
When WM writes:
>
{1, 2, 3, ..., n}
>
I think he might mean that n is somehow a largest natural number?

>
Nope, he just means some n e IN.

 So if n = 5, the FISON is:
 { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 }
 n = 3
 { 1, 2, 3 }
 Right?