Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

Am 03.12.2024 um 23:16 schrieb Moebius:

Am 03.12.2024 um 22:59 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

However, there is no largest natural number, when I think of that I see no limit to the naturals.

Right. No "coventional" limit. Actually,
      "lim_(n->oo) n"
does not exist.

I must be missing something here? ;^o

Yaeh. "Set-theoretical limit" and "coventional limit" (as defined in real analysis) are different notions.
Maybe it would be helful to write "LIM_(n->oo) ..." (instead of "lim_(n->oo) ...") for the former ...
.
.
.