Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 12/3/2024 2:32 PM, Moebius wrote:

Am 03.12.2024 um 23:16 schrieb Moebius:

Am 03.12.2024 um 22:59 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:

>

However, there is no largest natural number, when I think of that I see no limit to the naturals.

>
Right. No "coventional" limit. Actually,
>
      "lim_(n->oo) n"
>
does not exist.

 In the sense of as n tends to infinity there is no limit that can be reached as in a so-called largest natural number type of shit? Fair enough?