Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 04. Dec 2024, 19:52:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <014fc86287c38edf8f0a861a53712e020eab003e@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Wed, 04 Dec 2024 18:20:45 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 04.12.2024 16:33, joes wrote:
Am Wed, 04 Dec 2024 10:00:08 +0100 schrieb WM:
A* set of non-empty endsegments has a non-empty intersection. The
reason is inclusion-monotony.
*finite
No. Why should the intersection of endsegments get empty before the
endsegments?
What makes you think that?
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.