Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : richard (at) *nospam* damon-family.org (Richard Damon)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 06. Dec 2024, 00:48:50
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <607a1cfa738b9c9c09eab692c978cb6978e5d90b@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/5/24 11:08 AM, WM wrote:
On 05.12.2024 13:26, Richard Damon wrote:
Which ones can not be "taken" or "given".
Those with less than infinitely many successors. Cantor claims that all numbers are in his bijections. No successors remaining.
Regards, WM
Which since such numbers don't exist, there is no problem not being able to choose them.
In fact, being able to choose something that doesn't exist is a good sign of a problem.
Sorry, your logic is just all blown up, as your brain, from the contradictions in your logic.