Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

Le 09/12/2024 à 20:23, joes a écrit :

Am Mon, 09 Dec 2024 10:04:23 +0100 schrieb WM:

On 08.12.2024 19:01, Jim Burns wrote:
 

You (WM) are considering infinite dark.finite.cardinals,
which do not exist.

Then analysis is contradicted in set theory.
∀n ∈ ℕ: E(1)∩E(2)∩...∩E(n) = E(n).
The limit of the left-hand side is empty, the limit of the right-hand
side is full, i.e. not empty.
I do not tolerate that.

What is the RHS limit? Not that you have written out a sequence.

Especially as the limit of the sequence (E(n))_n IS EMPTY.
The point is not about what Crank Student Abuser Wolfgang Mückenheim "tolerates" or not.
The point is not about convincing such an idiotic demented crank of anything.
The point is how come such a demented criminal is allowed to "teach" in a German academic institution!