Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : ross.a.finlayson (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Ross Finlayson)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 12. Dec 2024, 22:10:56
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <VsidncyowdrmzMb6nZ2dnZfqnPGdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
On 12/12/2024 11:08 AM, FromTheRafters wrote:
After serious thinking WM wrote :
On 12.12.2024 13:26, Richard Damon wrote:
On 12/12/24 4:12 AM, WM wrote:
>
Note, "inifinite" isn't a Natural Number,
>
But a state,often dscribed byan infinite whole number.
>
Infinite whole number? Sheeesh!!
Oh, some have those as a simple consequence
of naive comprehension.
In number theory for example there's
point at infinity and so on, and anyways
there are theories where there are no
standard models of integers, only
fragments and extensions, which
do have infinitely-grand members.
Or, that's retro-finitism the
restriction of comprehension
to the ordinary, and it's
considered non-logical, also.
Sheesh? shush.