Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : invalid (at) *nospam* example.invalid (Moebius)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 13. Dec 2024, 23:48:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vjidja$3l0hp$2@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
Am 13.12.2024 um 03:35 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
On 12/10/2024 1:12 PM, Moebius wrote:
Am 10.12.2024 um 22:09 schrieb Chris M. Thomasson:
Shit. So, any natural number that WM cannot think of is dark? I guess.
>
Who knows? It's complicated. :-P
>
:-)
Yikes!
Try this!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVtHrgdcvZA.
.
.
("Numbers just for men.")