Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : noreply (at) *nospam* example.org (joes)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 14. Dec 2024, 12:13:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID : <40dac01626701a6a8101a1b31eae97ffefd398fa@i2pn2.org>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
User-Agent : Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2)
Am Thu, 12 Dec 2024 22:57:18 +0100 schrieb WM:
On 12.12.2024 14:59, joes wrote:
What Richard meant: do not confuse the set being mapped with the one
being mapped onto.
I don't. D = {10n | n ∈ ℕ} is the set being mapped. The set D being
mapped does not change when it is attached to the set ℕ being mapped in
form of black hats.
You change the domain from D to N.
-- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.