Sujet : Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
De : wolfgang.mueckenheim (at) *nospam* tha.de (WM)
Groupes : sci.mathDate : 14. Dec 2024, 17:06:04
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vjkadd$1tmt$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 14.12.2024 16:22, joes wrote:
Am Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:42:36 +0100 schrieb WM:
The subset is considered as its own independent set D = {10n | n ∈ ℕ}
and then it is attached to the set ℕ = {1, 2, 3, ...}. That does not
change the subset.
It changes the set from D to N and thus the function.
It changes the set from D to a subset of ℕ with same number of elements and proves that it cannot be changed to ℕ.
Regards, WM
Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)
Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)