Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers (extra-ordinary)

On 12/14/24 11:03 AM, WM wrote:

On 14.12.2024 16:20, joes wrote:

Am Fri, 13 Dec 2024 09:54:12 +0100 schrieb WM:

On 13.12.2024 03:29, Richard Damon wrote:

On 12/12/24 4:57 PM, WM wrote:

>

D = {10n | n ∈ ℕ} is the set being mapped. The set D being mapped does
not change when it is attached to the set ℕ being mapped in form of
black hats.

And so, which element of which set didn't get mapped to a member of the
other by the defined mapping?

No such element can be named. But 9/10 of all ℕ cannot get mapped
because the limit of the constant sequence 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, ... is 1/9.
This proves the existence of numbers which cannot be named.

Why do you want to map N\D to N?

 I don't. I show that it is impossible to map D to ℕ.
 Regards, WM
 

In other words, you are so stupid that you can't understand the simple mapping that was described, so you blow up your logic system with errors to hide your ignorance.